Monday, December 3, 2012

List of comments as of 10:00 12/3/12

List of comments as of 10:00 12/3/12 Nick Rachel Obama? I think Sarah G. Cara Camille Jimmy Kevin Matt Sam (dont know which one) Cam Jess Sarah Andrew Laurel Jared Collin

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

11/19/12 blog post

Today in class, we read over the remainder of chapter eight of Uncle Tom's Cabin. We then discussed what was going on in the story, as well as discussed the Fugative Slave Law. We discussed what the repercussions from helping a slave would be under the Fugative Slave Law, as well as what would be considered assisting a slave in their escape. This was a follow up to our lesson on Friday, in which we read over chapter eight of Uncle Tom's Cabin, after discussing the process of the underground railroad. So far on Python, I have continued to learn to make calculation programs that perform simple mathematical functions, through the tutorial that I discussed before, as well as learn more about the properties and uses of loops.

Friday, November 16, 2012

Dan Horgan 11/15/12 Period: E Was the US Constitution Pro or Anti-Slavery? Although one may make many arguments as to why the US Constitution was anti-slavery, I believe that it is pro-slavery. While I believe that the document was pro-slavery, I believe that it tried to exclude referencing slavery, when possible, to allow the issue to be resolved in time, rather than wholly favoring one side or the other. I also believe that the writers and signers of the Constitution may have unintentionally made it interpretable as pro-slavery, regardless of what their opinions may have been (which were probably pro-slavery). Putting this aside, because of the time period that the document was written in, and the stances that it takes regarding slavery, I believe that it was pro-slavery (which no longer applies in today’s world). The Constitution is pro-slavery for a plethora of reasons. Some of the parts of the Constitution that are pro-slavery are The Preamble, Article 1, Section 8, Article 4, Section 2, Article 1, Section 9, and Article 1, Section 2. The Preamble is less pro-slavery and more hypocritical, because it promises to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity. None of these three promises are guaranteed to slaves, even though the Constitution guarantees them. This brings up the point that slaves are not US citizens and thus are not bestowed with the rights guaranteed in the Constitution. I also believe that the writers of the Constitution may have meant white people when they said “We the people,” bringing up the possibility that the constitution protected only the free, and thus was pro-slavery. Article 1, Section 8, supports slavery, in that it gives congress the authority to suppress insurrections through military force, which prevents slaves from revolting or protesting, as well as taking away much power from anti-slavery activists, who hold public protests or rebellions. Article 4, Section 2, states “A Person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime. No Person held to Service or Labour in one State, under the Laws thereof, escaping into another, shall, in Consequence of any Law or Regulation therein, be discharged from such Service or Labour, but shall be delivered up on Claim of the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due.” This is in favor of slavery because it, like the fugitive slave law, requires slaves to be returned to their “rightful” owners, if they were to flee from slavery into another state. Article 1, Section 9, is pro-slavery because it prohibits congress from banning slavery before the year 1808. This is pro-slavery because it essentially allows slavery to continue in full force until 1808; there is an attempted justification for this statement, saying that a tax, not exceeding ten dollars per person may be imposed, but this does little to justify the guaranteed continuance of slavery until at least 1808. Article 1, Section 2, prevents slaves from running as representatives, because they are not US citizens, as well as only counting them as 3/5 of a person in the population of a state, relative to the house of representatives, which belittles the slaves, thus showing that slaves were not considered equal with other people, and proving that the Constitution was pro-slavery, because it did not view slaves as people, but merely as property, with little more value than cattle. I believe that the constitution is pro-slavery for many reasons. It was an injustice to slaves at the time and a burden to those who opposed slavery. The Constitution may not have intended to be pro-slavery, but it made things much easier on slaveholders than it did on slaves and abolitionists. The writers of the Constitution, however, were white men in the 1700s, which does explain their actions, but does not justify them. The Constitution was a pro-slavery document at the time it was written and was in dire need of change.

Wednesday, November 14, 2012

John C. Calhoun Voicethread

30 days part II

30 Days Part II For the second assignment of the 30 day challenge, I have first taken a look at other similar programming languages; C++ and html. I believe that because I have already downloaded python, it is better to stick with it. I have also delved a bit deeper into the terminology of python, and in fact all programming. I have also found another, interactive tutorial, that is a bit more straight forward and easier to grasp (http://cscircles.cemc.uwaterloo.ca). I have learned how to use create basic loops, such as for and while loops, allowing me to make more complex functions.
30 Days For my "30 day challenge", I have decided to study the programming language python. This language can be used along with an interpreter to create programs with many different functions. I have no prior experience in programming, so I may need to practice with more simple programs, such as C, C++, or html, until I understand all of the concepts and vocabulary required to learn such a thing. I chose to use python as my language, because there are a series of tutorial videos for the language that I have come across before, but never watched, because I had no experience, but as soon as I thought of programming, I remembered the tutorials and decided to use python. So far, I have watched a multitude of videos on the subject, that teach me basic commands and terms, such as strings, which allow you to create text, and how to add numbers and perform simple operations. I have also written, along with the help of the tutorial, a simple factorial program, which allows me to multiply all of the terms in a certain range, by the preceeding number. For example: 10! or 10 factorial, would be 1*2*3*4*5*6*7*8*9*10. These numbers are stored in a range of range(11), because it excludes the final number (enter 10 in the program). The result would be 3628800. number=eval(input("enter a non-negative integer to take the factorial of: ")) product=1 for i in range(number): product=product*(i+1) print(product)

Friday, September 7, 2012

3 artifacts from perspective of historian

 
Daniel Horgan
7/9/12
 
3 Artifacts to describe myself from the perspective of a historian
 



 
 After doing much research on Daniel Horgan, I have decided to use 3 artifacts to describe him, such as his hp pavillion dv5 laptop computer, his xbox 360 slim, and his homemade electric guitar. Although each one of these are electronic devices, I assure you that he was a very active, adventurous person. I chose his laptop to describe his interest in technolegy, as well as his interest in how that technolegy works, and his thirst for knowlege. From what I have gathered, I know that Dan was very interested in how the universe works, as shown in his internet history. He has used the internet many times to look up subjects such as the string theory, neuroscience, and in fact, any subject that he was interested or curious about. Daniel appeared to have an interest in the scientific fields, rather than other topics, but seemed to have exeptional knowledge on other subjects, such as math, English, or history. I chose his xbox 360 to describe him, because based on the games he chooses to play, he appears to find things with a better and more detailed plot more appealing, than ridiculous games that make no sense. For example, he would rather play Assassins Creed than Call of Duty, due to its well developed plotline and use of historical fiction, rather than Call of Duty, for its multiplayer and repetitiveness. It also describes his amount of free time (too much), as well as his self control (the ability to stop playing in order to complete schoolwork). Daniel appeared to enjoy video games in his down time, but did not obsess over them, as there were more important things for him to do. The third artifact that I have chosen to describe Daniel is his homemade electric guitar. He did not actually play guitar, but had an interest in the mechanics of how they work. After lots of hard work and perserverance, he was able to sucessfully create a guitar from scratch. This demonstrates his ability to work towards a goal with no immediate motivation or rewards. It also represents his interest in mechanical and electrical engineering, which he enjoyed almost as much as physics. Daniel had a complex personality, but did not have many things to describe that personality or his past. He was a mysterious person, but I'm glam that I was able to shed a bit of light on him.